From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Jun 24 21:17:36 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id VAA28757
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 24 Jun 1997 21:17:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA28746
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 24 Jun 1997 21:17:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id VAA19133; Tue, 24 Jun 1997 21:17:45 -0700 (PDT)
To: Michael Smith <msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au>
cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: libedit, etc. (CVS issues) 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 25 Jun 1997 12:57:20 +0930."
             <199706250327.MAA28115@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> 
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 1997 21:17:44 -0700
Message-ID: <19130.867212264@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> A second case is ftp.  In this one, there have been no significant
> changes for quite some time, but the NetBSD changes are quite
> substantial.  
> - Would it be best to drop the NetBSD code in wholesale on top, replacing
>   what is there outright?

Well, just so long as theirs works, I don't see a problem with that. :-)

					Jordan