Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 23 Nov 2006 11:51:05 -0800
From:      "Kip Macy" <kip.macy@gmail.com>
To:        "Ceri Davies" <ceri@submonkey.net>, "Kip Macy" <kip.macy@gmail.com>,  "Kip Macy" <kmacy@freebsd.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org,  cvs-src@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/sun4v/include asm.h src/sys/sun4v/sun4v hcall.S interrupt.S support.S t1_copy.S
Message-ID:  <b1fa29170611231151g4f747cc8n89610e5c38e37207@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20061123194238.GA5219@submonkey.net>
References:  <200611230225.kAN2PGYi043437@repoman.freebsd.org> <20061123145304.GF973@submonkey.net> <b1fa29170611231139j14b9a3d3kd5b95c55a61e9605@mail.gmail.com> <20061123194238.GA5219@submonkey.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Tell whom? My engineering contact knows. Should I inform Sun legal? In my
experience, the legal department's number one concern is CYA, not Sun or the
community.

         -Kip

On 11/23/06, Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 11:39:25AM -0800, Kip Macy wrote:
> >
> > On 11/23/06, Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net> wrote:
> > >
> > >On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 02:25:16AM +0000, Kip Macy wrote:
> > >> kmacy       2006-11-23 02:25:16 UTC
> > >>
> > >>   FreeBSD src repository
> > >>
> > >>   Modified files:
> > >>     sys/sun4v/include    asm.h
> > >>     sys/sun4v/sun4v      hcall.S interrupt.S support.S t1_copy.S
> > >>   Log:
> > >>   In contrast to the non-obvious and flexible nature of the optimized
> > >>   bcopy in t1_copy.S (which shall retain its CDDL copyright, and thus
> > >>   likely be removed from GENERIC) I have removed the CDDL from
> hcall.S
> > >>   because there is zero flexibility in the implementation of
> > >>   hypercalls as they derive directly from the hypervisor interface
> > >>   which is not copyrighted (ironically the source for the hypervisor
> > >>   itself is BSD licensed).
> > >>
> > >>   It is best to start any bikeshed about this as soon as possible.
> > >
> > >OK, I'll bite.
> > >
> > >>   Discussed with: bsdimp
> > >
> > >And Sun?
>
> > Interfaces aren't copyrightable.
>
> I'm sure I agree, but it would be polite if nothing else to actually
> tell them rather than let them find out.
>
> Ceri
> --
> That must be wonderful!  I don't understand it at all.
>                                                   -- Moliere
>
>
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b1fa29170611231151g4f747cc8n89610e5c38e37207>