From owner-freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 8 18:13:17 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: usb@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBAD916A468; Wed, 8 Aug 2007 18:13:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from remko@elvandar.org) Received: from guardian.elvandar.org (evilcoder.xs4all.nl [195.64.94.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 729CA13C4CE; Wed, 8 Aug 2007 18:13:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from remko@elvandar.org) Received: by guardian.elvandar.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 8457B7EDE49; Wed, 8 Aug 2007 19:54:14 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 19:54:14 +0200 From: Remko Lodder To: David Southwell Message-ID: <20070808175414.GC51816@elvandar.org> References: <200708081620.l78GK69W018680@freefall.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200708081620.l78GK69W018680@freefall.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) Cc: usb@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/114667: [umass] UMASS device error log problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD support for USB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2007 18:13:17 -0000 On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 04:20:06PM +0000, David Southwell wrote: > The following reply was made to PR kern/114667; it has been noted by GNATS. > > From: David Southwell > To: bug-followup@freebsd.org, > david@vizion2000.net > Cc: > Subject: Re: kern/114667: [umass] UMASS device error log problem > Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 09:27:59 -0700 > > Hi > > Just wondered if anyone might have the time to look at this -- it really is a > nuisance. > > Thanks Hello David, I just checked the PR itself and I personally do not think this is something we should handle though, the messages get in the logfile because you ask for information on a 'heavily removable' device, it mostly has multiple ports and the device has no knowledge to see what 'port' is being used [if at all used]. That said; this is my private opinion, others might ofcourse disagree with me, please feel free to continue to discuss this, but in addittion I also think this is not worth a PR ticket. Cheers remko -- Kind regards, Remko Lodder ** remko@elvandar.org FreeBSD ** remko@FreeBSD.org /* Quis custodiet ipsos custodes */