From owner-cvs-all Mon Dec 16 16:53:43 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1AD837B401; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 16:53:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from kayak.xcllnt.net (209-128-86-226.BAYAREA.NET [209.128.86.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2980A43EC2; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 16:53:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Received: from dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net [192.168.4.201]) by kayak.xcllnt.net (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id gBH0r2rT080184; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 16:53:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@kayak.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: from dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id gBH0rhpP029215; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 16:53:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: (from marcel@localhost) by dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id gBH0rhZN029201; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 16:53:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel) Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 16:53:42 -0800 From: Marcel Moolenaar To: Julian Elischer Cc: Nate Lawson , Julian Elischer , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/i386 dump_machdep.c Message-ID: <20021217005342.GA27317@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 03:19:12PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > Functionally, it is important that this check be MI. > > I thought about that. > Different architectures can have different dump sizes (theoretically) > so only the MD code can know how much room it needs. > For example, ia64 might decide to implement sparse dumps. Different architectures already have different dump sizes, because both ia64 and sparc64 have sparse memory dumps and each has overhead to keep track of the memory chunks. ia64 uses ELF as the container, sparc64 has something else. So, yes; the check has to be MD. -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message