From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 31 09:13:25 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEAFAC6F for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 09:13:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hskuhra@eumx.net) Received: from eumx.net (eumx.net [91.82.101.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60E058FC18 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 09:13:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=eumx.net; h=date :message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-type; s=default; bh=vyO+hDoRvIh1kKeLSSLbuX gdotI=; b=tUxvugiDfBOMcIq55Gz0E/JUBCPWTlpQLxxm/dP8C4CUh0WmoC/S3O xikyWTSBbyKMOYmZlmlPvygI4DSG01Z6DtzjT/SzEiDMc8/4o+brjTCEFNFh7xPF FxwRp/RGNR8qJ6JETvVVrWgDDij6h29OZEqgTMySe1c5ngX4X3EO4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=eumx.net; h=date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=EXQ5nLuZMzguh6OxKknjDa6INiUOu V0ZWShgK23tkrICT0FVafChHcgVbh+6vTOWe1r4DDVwwxfInLj75ecDGBF54Oel4 Co4iKSCt4fPumxy6gtgVFFbn43NALo0PRfN2R1bw5pTd6AcTXDHooflhoEfqrlKm RBUwcWCBbPi8OI= Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 10:13:15 +0100 Message-ID: <87k3ry60us.wl%hskuhra@eumx.net> From: "Herbert J. Skuhra" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: following 9-STABLE but getting 9.1-PRERELEASE In-Reply-To: References: User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue) FLIM/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?B?R29qxY0=?=) APEL/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/24.3.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Marco Beishuizen X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 09:13:25 -0000 On Mon, 31 Dec 2012 09:42:03 +0100 (CET) Marco Beishuizen wrote: > Hi, > > I'm following the 9-STABLE branch with svn and just updated my > system. But after booting I noticed that my system is still at > 9.1-PRERELEASE, and not 9.1-STABLE or 9-STABLE. > > Does someone know what happened? Yeah, sys/conf/newvers.sh in stable/9 has not been updated yet. It will happen... -- Herbert