From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 30 21:10:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7132D1065673; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:10:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sam@freebsd.org) Received: from ebb.errno.com (ebb.errno.com [69.12.149.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 453798FC0A; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:10:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sam@freebsd.org) Received: from trouble.errno.com (trouble.errno.com [10.0.0.248]) (authenticated bits=0) by ebb.errno.com (8.13.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id n5ULAUZI075355 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:10:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sam@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <4A4A7F46.2070904@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:10:30 -0700 From: Sam Leffler Organization: FreeBSD Project User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090411) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marc Balmer References: <200906301851.n5UIpNJQ089171@svn.freebsd.org> <20090630.133608.-1703974521.imp@bsdimp.com> <0E6D4FB2-A485-40ED-A856-ACC311A90EFE@msys.ch> In-Reply-To: <0E6D4FB2-A485-40ED-A856-ACC311A90EFE@msys.ch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-DCC-sonic.net-Metrics: ebb.errno.com; whitelist Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, mbr@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, "M. Warner Losh" Subject: Re: svn commit: r195200 - in head/usr.sbin: . wake X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:10:32 -0000 Marc Balmer wrote: > > Am 30.06.2009 um 21:36 schrieb M. Warner Losh: > >> wake really is too generic a name for this. Why didn't the wol port >> get committed anyway, it seems to be better than this... > > wake is a short, mnemonic and imperative name that describes what the > command does. It is exactly the same command as in NetBSD. And you're conveniently ignoring the "discussion" that took place after the netbsd drive-by. Sam