From owner-freebsd-java Sun Oct 29 9:10: 7 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from ns.yogotech.com (ns.yogotech.com [206.127.123.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9117E37B479 for ; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 09:10:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from nomad.yogotech.com (nomad.yogotech.com [206.127.123.131]) by ns.yogotech.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA11437; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 10:08:23 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from nate@nomad.yogotech.com) Received: (from nate@localhost) by nomad.yogotech.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA04295; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 10:08:20 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from nate) Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 10:08:20 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <200010291708.KAA04295@nomad.yogotech.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: mmercer@ipass.net Cc: Max Khon , freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Problem with appletviewer in jdk1.2.2b10 In-Reply-To: <39FC3AA1.FA3ED9DC@ipass.net> References: <39FC3AA1.FA3ED9DC@ipass.net> X-Mailer: VM 6.34 under 19.16 "Lille" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams) Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > I understood your answer to the question : is it supposed to be so or > not? (yes) to mean it is supposed to be built. With that in context, > my question, will it be corrected any time soon? is asking will the > build be corrected to compile the shared library of gcc. libgcc is *NOT* supposed to be built shared. However, as you point out, the binaries created by gcc are dependant upon these routines, so they should be linked into the final executable. IMO, the problem is in the linker not pulling these routines into the 'driver' binaries, but I don't know how to fix that. In short, this isn't a JDK problem per-se, but a build-tool problem. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message