Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 23:01:26 +0200 From: Ulrich =?utf-8?B?U3DDtnJsZWlu?= <uqs@FreeBSD.org> To: "Simon L. B. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: why we don't build ps/pdf of /usr/src/share/doc/usd/ ? Message-ID: <20120812210125.GI1202@acme.spoerlein.net> In-Reply-To: <FBD8F575-BE57-4FD8-8DB6-A28CEE9F01C9@FreeBSD.org> References: <201208092302.q79N2BcA079307@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <FBD8F575-BE57-4FD8-8DB6-A28CEE9F01C9@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 2012-08-11 at 23:45:04 +0100, Simon L. B. Nielsen wrote: > > On 10 Aug 2012, at 00:02, Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bristol.ac.uk> wrote: > > > We build /usr/src/share/doc/usd/ into ascii > > documents. Is there a reason why we don't > > also build Postscript or PDF? > > I suspect since it was considered waste of space originally when it was set up. > > If anyone were to touch those docs I would suggest moving them to the doc repository instead of changing them where they currently exist as they don't really belong in src. I have this planned, but as with many things I hardly get to do any of them. The move to doc is needed to cut groff out of the base system. Cheers, Uli
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120812210125.GI1202>