From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Apr 23 17:04:15 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2B3BFA6DDB for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 17:04:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pete@nomadlogic.org) Received: from vps-mail.nomadlogic.org (mail.nomadlogic.org [IPv6:2607:f2f8:a098::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 757C96F1A1 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 17:04:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pete@nomadlogic.org) Received: from [192.168.1.223] (cpe-75-82-194-8.socal.res.rr.com [75.82.194.8]) by vps-mail.nomadlogic.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id c4c486f7 TLS version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 10:04:12 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Porting Chronograf to FreeBSD To: Eitan Adler Cc: Stefan Lambrev , freebsd ports References: <9123b7ce-95a6-4e55-a471-8e4a134b3d76@email.android.com> From: Pete Wright Message-ID: Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 10:04:20 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 17:04:15 -0000 On 04/22/2018 14:27, Eitan Adler wrote: > On 22 April 2018 at 13:20, Pete Wright wrote: >> >> On Apr 22, 2018 12:57 PM, Eitan Adler wrote: >> >> On 25 November 2017 at 10:50, Stefan Lambrev wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I've got the port to a working state ( >>> https://github.com/cheffo/FreeBSD-Ports/tree/master/net-mgmt/chronograf) >> What happened to this effort? I'd love to see a chronograf port. >> >> >> I would too - but I believe it's only available for people using the pay-for >> version on Influxdb or influx-cloud according to the home page: > I'm using it as a self-compiled binary - and its open source. It seems > to Just Work. I don't have time to maintain it as a proper port > though. > > > oh shoot - i had just read their public webpage and didn't even realize it was OSS. -p -- Pete Wright pete@nomadlogic.org @nomadlogicLA