From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 5 20:32:41 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE05137B401; Mon, 5 May 2003 20:32:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from builder.freebsdmall.com (builder.freebsdmall.com [65.86.180.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7627043FA3; Mon, 5 May 2003 20:32:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from root@builder.freebsdmall.com) Received: by builder.freebsdmall.com (Postfix, from userid 0) id 29531F2D; Mon, 5 May 2003 20:32:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 20:32:41 -0700 From: Murray Stokely To: Kris Kennaway Message-ID: <20030506033241.GK385@freebsdmall.com> References: <200305040617.h446Hc3s022700@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030506030249.GT84427@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20030506030509.GA34272@rot13.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030506030509.GA34272@rot13.obsecurity.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-GPG-Key-ID: 1024D/0E451F7D X-GPG-Key-Fingerprint: E2CA 411D DD44 53FD BB4B 3CB5 B4D7 10A2 0E45 1F7D cc: Greg 'groggy' Lehey cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/man/man5 rc.conf.5 X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 May 2003 03:32:42 -0000 On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 08:05:10PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > I missed this. What's supposed to replace it? > > There are several other routing protocol implementations in ports, > e.g. zebra. > > Removing gated was not a choice, as the code is no longer freely > available, and it was not under a permissive license so the old > version is no longer usable either. .. and I kept being harassed by NextHop representatives looking for royalties. ;( I made sure to mark it as RESTRICTED, notify other CDROM vendors, and put it in the legal problems file well over a year ago, but the port survived a little longer and the documentation still may not be completely up to date. - Murray