From owner-freebsd-arch Fri Jan 10 4: 3:18 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59EC037B401 for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 04:03:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailman.zeta.org.au (mailman.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C04943F1E for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 04:03:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bde@zeta.org.au) Received: from katana.zip.com.au (katana.zip.com.au [61.8.7.246]) by mailman.zeta.org.au (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA02966; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 23:03:08 +1100 Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 23:03:52 +1100 (EST) From: Bruce Evans X-X-Sender: bde@gamplex.bde.org To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: small bsd.prog.mk change In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20030110224932.A20648-100000@gamplex.bde.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Bruce Evans writes: > > Seomthing like this has been tried before, but apparently not finished. > > See revs.1.109-1.110. The above has a smaller scope than rev.1.109 so > > I think it doesn't have the problems of rev.1.109, but it leaves > > revs.1-109-1.110 unfinished and creates a style bug by not removing > > vestiges of rev.1.110. To fix the style bug, back out revs.1.109-1.110 > > before adding the ifdef as above, so that there is only 1 copy of the > > rule. > > How's this? [Context lost to attachment] OK with me. Also consider zapping the _EXTRADEPEND rule. It only works with the default rule for ${PROG}. In boot/i386/loader, this currently just gives a bogus dependency on ${LIBC}. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message