From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 11 14:28:48 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B42C106564A; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 14:28:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76BFB8FC19; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 14:28:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from odyssey.starpoint.kiev.ua (alpha-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.101]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id RAA23759; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 17:28:45 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <4E1B089C.90001@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 17:28:44 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110705 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jung-uk Kim References: <201107072002.16059.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <4E16D92C.5000508@FreeBSD.org> <201107081623.50665.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <201107081729.46242.jkim@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <201107081729.46242.jkim@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2pre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [CFT] Update OpenJDK6 to b23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 14:28:48 -0000 on 09/07/2011 00:29 Jung-uk Kim said the following: > On Friday 08 July 2011 04:23 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote: >> On Friday 08 July 2011 06:17 am, Andriy Gapon wrote: >>> on 08/07/2011 03:02 Jung-uk Kim said the following: >>>> I have a patch to update java/openjdk6 to b23: >>>> >>>> http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/openjdk6-b23.diff >>>> >>>> Please test and report any regression. >>> >>> Can this update be used as a chance to spin off icedtea web >>> plugin into a separate port? >> >> I was going to do it separately but I think it's clearer. >> >> IcedTea-Web 1.1 port: >> http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/icedtea-web-ports.tar.gz >> >> (Updated) java/openjdk6 patch: >> http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/openjdk6-b23_1.diff > > BTW, I have alternative port/patch: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/icedtea-web-ports_1.tar.gz > http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/openjdk6-b23_2.diff > > Basically, the IcedTea patch for IcedTea-Web is controlled by ICEDTEA > option and it is turned on by default. > > I am not sure which is better. :-/ Thanks a lot for doing all of this! I slightly prefer the second approach, but it is your call :) -- Andriy Gapon