From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Oct 9 12:30:30 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from peach.ocn.ne.jp (peach.ocn.ne.jp [210.145.254.87]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DDD214DB5 for ; Sat, 9 Oct 1999 12:30:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dcs@newsguy.com) Received: from newsguy.com (p29-dn01kiryunisiki.gunma.ocn.ne.jp [210.132.6.158]) by peach.ocn.ne.jp (8.9.1a/OCN) with ESMTP id EAA27175; Sun, 10 Oct 1999 04:30:10 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <37FF8447.9BE11979@newsguy.com> Date: Sun, 10 Oct 1999 03:07:03 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en,pt-BR,ja MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Will Andrews Cc: Marcel Moolenaar , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: merging current's jail functionality to stable References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Will Andrews wrote: > > So, I say, leave it out of -STABLE until 4.0-CURRENT becomes -STABLE (probably > February-March 2000?). Vendors have plenty of time until then to reimplement > their suser()-dependent features. I heard march 2000, likely to slip. Alas, we need a stable newbus, and, if at all possible, devfs. Do you see that by march 2000? I don't. Going -stable on 4.x before newbus itself becomes stable would be an error. IMHO. -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org "I always feel generous when I'm in the inner circle of a conspiracy to subvert the world order and, with a small group of allies, just defeated an alien invasion. Maybe I should value myself a little more?" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message