Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 2 Apr 2018 19:02:59 -0700 (PDT)
From:      "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net>
To:        Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
Cc:        Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org>, Dimitry Andric <dim@freebsd.org>, Antoine Brodin <antoine@freebsd.org>, svn-src-stable@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org>, re <re@freebsd.org>, svn-src-stable-11@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r331838 - in stable/11: . contrib/compiler-rt/include/sanitizer contrib/compiler-rt/include/xray contrib/compiler-rt/lib/BlocksRuntime contrib/compiler-rt/lib/asan contrib/compiler-rt/l...
Message-ID:  <201804030202.w3322xXG085227@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net>
In-Reply-To: <20180403014734.GA31748@lonesome.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> So, the takeaway is, this change stays, and stable/11 users that build
> their own ports are on their own?
> 
> Whatever happened to POLA?

I have no idea, but I fully agree that changing compilers 30 days before
a code slush is just a very bad move.

The llvm in 11.1 is 4.
Is there some pressing reason that we need llvm 6 to be in release 11.2?

Looks like I wont be upgrading to 11.2 as I am sure I'll have blocking
issues with some ports.

Though I could probably build them with 11.1, I hate that idea as then
I have to keep an 11.1 around incase I need to rebuild something.

:-(
-- 
Rod Grimes                                                 rgrimes@freebsd.org



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201804030202.w3322xXG085227>