From owner-freebsd-doc  Sat May 11  6:30: 7 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDA6137B400
	for <freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org>; Sat, 11 May 2002 06:30:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g4BDU3o82143;
	Sat, 11 May 2002 06:30:03 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gnats)
Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 06:30:03 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <200205111330.g4BDU3o82143@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: docs/37943: [PATCH] minor corrections for cutting-edge
Reply-To: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@FreeBSD.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-doc.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-doc>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-doc>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

The following reply was made to PR docs/37943; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@FreeBSD.org>
To: Martin Heinen <martin@sumuk.de>
Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: docs/37943: [PATCH] minor corrections for cutting-edge
Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 16:01:46 +0300

 On 2002-05-11 13:09, Martin Heinen wrote:
 > > This is also touched by patches of another PR I was reading.  One
 > > submitted by Greg Shapiro.  If someone commits this one or the diff I
 > > sent in the audit trail of that PR a little merging work will be
 > > necessary for this part ;)
 >
 > As Greg noted, this section needs some work.  Therefore we can drop
 > my suggestions and use PR 36773 instead.
 
 If Greg says 'aye' to that other patch, I'll do the merge of the two :>
 
 > > > -          Pentium 3 with 128 MB of RAM takes about 2 hours to build
 > > > +          Pentium III with 128 MB of RAM takes about 2 hours to build
 > >
 > > Is this really necessary?  I'm not saying it's wrong or something.
 > > But is III the way these processors should be referred to in written
 > > text?
 >
 > I compared with Intels Website:
 >
 >   http://www.intel.com/products/browse/processor.htm?iid=ipp_nav+browse_proc&
 
 I guess it's settled then.  If Intel calls it a Pentium III, this is
 what we should call it too, IMHO.
 
 - Giorgos
 

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message