From owner-freebsd-current Fri Aug 21 21:01:18 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA20768 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Fri, 21 Aug 1998 21:01:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [209.133.7.234]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA20755 for ; Fri, 21 Aug 1998 21:01:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA02960; Fri, 21 Aug 1998 21:00:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com) Message-Id: <199808220400.VAA02960@rah.star-gate.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Tom cc: Scott Michel , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Intel PRO/1000 Gigabit Adapter In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 21 Aug 1998 20:47:44 PDT." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1998 21:00:29 -0700 From: Amancio Hasty Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Yep. I wonder if AGP slots can be used for non-video applications? AGP > has about 4 times the bandwidth of PCI. Of course, you can only have > on such adapter. >From little reading that I have done on AGP is ideal for very fast networking and also I don't see why it has to be limited to one adapter thats more of the function of the interface to the board or how a designer choses to interface its internal components . Cheers, Amancio To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message