Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 8 Apr 2013 11:13:45 +0300
From:      "Sergey V. Dyatko" <sergey.dyatko@gmail.com>
To:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Growing list of required(ish) ports
Message-ID:  <20130408111345.489389d6@laptop.minsk.domain>
In-Reply-To: <20130408095702.72e84f9c@bsd64.grem.de>
References:  <CA%2BQLa9Af3CC=FKMkrnmSL_-frW7ZvCQJ3=q7xkHUz5-3YyE3fQ@mail.gmail.com> <51622F44.3050604@FreeBSD.org> <CA%2BQLa9C5pfcRWrLXEiKzZEvVYd5W=wbN9i5wjtp=m92Fn8oq5w@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2B7WWSfwGBfXRcmc0UJ2ebguq5%2B-pYY82eopicpPcgeKxUCj3A@mail.gmail.com> <CAN6yY1ttmkiV_ns1qfhjd8ROiZ8WfUfmaj%2Ba1N6Ezapj3-QNcw@mail.gmail.com> <CAO%2BPfDeoijprJUwooKTTiEoLKf8V7MDtm7QCO1CuPeiQtCgU-Q@mail.gmail.com> <20130408095702.72e84f9c@bsd64.grem.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 8 Apr 2013 09:57:02 +0200
Michael Gmelin <freebsd@grem.de> wrote:

> On Mon, 8 Apr 2013 09:31:50 +0200
> David Demelier <demelier.david@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > For me I also wanted pkg to be in base but they made a bootstrap
> > that does not need any other requirement so I stick with that and
> > I'm happy.
> > 
> 
> Last time I checked the bootstrapping mechanism installed an outdated
> version of pkg (1.0.2 while 1.0.9 was current in ports).
> 

check it now, AFAIK now it is lattest

> > 
> > Cheers,
> > 
> > --
> > Demelier David
> > _______________________________________________
> > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> > "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 



-- 
wbr, tiger



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130408111345.489389d6>