From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 29 21:57:50 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B564316A4CE for ; Sat, 29 Jan 2005 21:57:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from makeworld.com (makeworld.com [198.92.228.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E81F43D2F for ; Sat, 29 Jan 2005 21:57:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.com [127.0.0.1]) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABC6D60F0; Sat, 29 Jan 2005 15:57:49 -0600 (CST) Received: from makeworld.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (makeworld.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 74913-03; Sat, 29 Jan 2005 15:57:47 -0600 (CST) Received: from [198.92.228.34] (racerx.makeworld.com [198.92.228.34]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 770C960E7; Sat, 29 Jan 2005 15:57:47 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <41FC0719.1070702@makeworld.com> Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 15:58:49 -0600 From: Chris User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050101) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andy Firman References: <20050129215051.GA28318@akroteq.com> In-Reply-To: <20050129215051.GA28318@akroteq.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by ClamAV 0.75.1/amavisd-new-2.2.1 (20041222) at makeworld.com - Isn't it ironic cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 2 quick firewall questions for FreBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 21:57:50 -0000 Andy Firman wrote: > First, if one were to deploy FreeBSD 5.3 as a standard > web and email server, would it need a firewall? > I don't see the point because only ports like 25 for > smtp, 110 for pop, 80 for http, etc... will be listening > and open for connections with or without a firewall. > > Second, I would like to replace my Linux gateway running > Shorewall. Shorewall is a nice package for managing the > netfilter firewall capabilities of the Linux kernel. > Is there something similar for FreeBSD? Let's look at #2 - Is this server running a WM? If so, why? -- Best regards, Chris If the faulty part is in stock, it didn't need replacing in the first place.