From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 8 20:51:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D3CB16A4CE; Mon, 8 Nov 2004 20:51:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.village.org [168.103.84.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1139543D2D; Mon, 8 Nov 2004 20:51:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by harmony.village.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iA8KovVJ031112; Mon, 8 Nov 2004 13:50:58 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2004 13:51:23 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <20041108.135123.61228519.imp@bsdimp.com> To: green@freebsd.org From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20041108202245.GE1069@green.homeunix.org> References: <20041108.123912.113102111.imp@bsdimp.com> <20041108202245.GE1069@green.homeunix.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Comments requested on adding ports modules to kernel build X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2004 20:51:03 -0000 In message: <20041108202245.GE1069@green.homeunix.org> Brian Fundakowski Feldman writes: : On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 12:39:12PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: : > I've been using the following for a while to automatically rebuild and : > install a kernel module on one of my machines. I think this is : > useful in general and would like to commit it. : > : > Comments? : : Something like this is generally useful, but it should be easier and : I would think more correct to instead have the target do portupgrade -f. Why do you think that's the case? Warner