From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 29 04:48:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23AA016A4D0 for ; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 04:48:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.ewetel.de (mail2-116.ewetel.de [212.6.122.116]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1018843D31 for ; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 04:48:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from uwe.laverenz@ewetel.net) Received: from athena.laverenz.de (dialin-80-228-13-121.ewetel.net [80.228.13.121]) by mail2.ewetel.de (8.12.1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i1TCm0VA020156 for ; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 13:48:01 +0100 (MET) Received: from localhost (localhost.laverenz.de [127.0.0.1]) by athena.laverenz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 967465797C for ; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 13:47:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from athena.laverenz.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (athena.laverenz.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 11507-02 for ; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 13:47:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from ewetel.net (lotus.laverenz.de [192.168.100.6]) by athena.laverenz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39EBE57851 for ; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 13:47:54 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4041DF79.5040908@ewetel.net> Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 13:47:53 +0100 From: Uwe Laverenz Organization: private site User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040226 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: current@freebsd.org References: <20040229011945.GA86654@blaxxtarz.evangelion.free> In-Reply-To: <20040229011945.GA86654@blaxxtarz.evangelion.free> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at laverenz.de X-CheckCompat: OK X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 05:38:47 -0800 Subject: Re: ATAPICAM broken in 5.2.1 (did work in 5.2)? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 12:48:04 -0000 Dierk Sacher wrote: > There is no difference, if I disable ACPI or have a medium in the drive > or not. If I compile a kernel without "option atapicam" the panic goes > away. Maybe there's something wrong with your kernel config? The entry should be "device atapicam", not "option atapicam". I have 2 machines running 5.2.1 with atapicam: no problems. cu, Uwe