From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 20 11:29:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F3A916A41F for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 11:29:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from erik.winge@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33B6C43D46 for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 11:29:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from erik.winge@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 36so1507077wra for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 04:29:52 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=gKpfGYjNpdlJfLFfe/Au+zg7CEN5FrQDaowJxjF+MKGDfgV3RoLgXwIeBmdVAoByndFo5EtdwvhZouCjyNP89jyIv2iXOBiNx3iC8AAU2YBSVOubZ5HfFledS0QljL9Svbj3PHwZgAM1ro859hee0KitFacgRVTMrF1PICBRNGU= Received: by 10.54.34.61 with SMTP id h61mr34589wrh; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 04:29:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.80.4 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 04:29:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4cf221cc05072004295dbdfd3d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 13:29:02 +0200 From: Erik Winge To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <42DB9B45.9010305@cytexbg.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <4cf221cc050717045319c1f3cf@mail.gmail.com> <42DA9332.2030200@errno.com> <4cf221cc050718035328cfb071@mail.gmail.com> <42DB9B45.9010305@cytexbg.com> Subject: Re: if_ural in 6.0-BETA1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Erik Winge List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 11:29:53 -0000 On 7/18/05, Niki Denev wrote: >=20 > I'm not really sure, so this is just a guess, but can this be caused by > the power management of the card? > Does it dissociate when its configured with '-powersave' flag? No, that doesn't seem to help. Since this is a desktop system, I wouldn't expect it to have any power management at all? Erik Winge