From owner-freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Apr 19 11:35:00 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-isdn@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CA9437B401
	for <freebsd-isdn@freebsd.org>; Sat, 19 Apr 2003 11:35:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 708C043FE5
	for <freebsd-isdn@freebsd.org>; Sat, 19 Apr 2003 11:34:59 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h3JIYlqm010427;
	Sat, 19 Apr 2003 20:34:58 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
To: Michael Koerner <Michael@Koerner.De>
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 19 Apr 2003 20:25:27 +0200."
             <3EA19497.80101@Koerner.De> 
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2003 20:34:47 +0200
Message-ID: <10426.1050777287@critter.freebsd.dk>
cc: freebsd-isdn <freebsd-isdn@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: New Kernel under 5.0 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-isdn@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Using ISDN with FreeBSD <freebsd-isdn.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isdn>,
	<mailto:freebsd-isdn-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-isdn>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-isdn@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-isdn-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isdn>,
	<mailto:freebsd-isdn-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2003 18:35:00 -0000

In message <3EA19497.80101@Koerner.De>, Michael Koerner writes:
>
>I did some homework and actually read the FreeBSD-Handbook, but no pointers there. And I have simply overread ca 5 times the first lines: stupid, but shit happens. 
>
>Now that I know why there are suddenly two places where I need to look, and where the second place is, it all makes sense of course. I simply couldn't imagine a good reason for not having a full documented file there anymore.
>
>And of course I should have used less strong words: "wonder" instead of "ranting" would have been the better choice. 

No worries.

If I had more hours in a day, I'd spend more of them making it (even)
easier for our users...

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.