From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 17 08:53:57 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 157A51065673 for ; Mon, 17 Mar 2008 08:53:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-net@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB5278FC19 for ; Mon, 17 Mar 2008 08:53:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-net@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JbB6M-0002Lh-Uc for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Mon, 17 Mar 2008 08:53:50 +0000 Received: from 195.208.174.178 ([195.208.174.178]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 17 Mar 2008 08:53:50 +0000 Received: from vadim_nuclight by 195.208.174.178 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 17 Mar 2008 08:53:50 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: Vadim Goncharov Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 08:53:42 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Nuclear Lightning @ Tomsk, TPU AVTF Hostel Lines: 24 Message-ID: References: <20080314232456.GQ91152@hal.rescomp.berkeley.edu> <47DB1C6A.8050908@elischer.org> X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 195.208.174.178 X-Comment-To: Julian Elischer User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (FreeBSD) Sender: news Subject: Re: Behavior of `ipfw table n list' in 7.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: vadim_nuclight@mail.ru List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 08:53:57 -0000 Hi Julian Elischer! On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:46:34 -0700; Julian Elischer wrote about 'Re: Behavior of `ipfw table n list' in 7.0': > I think the dotted quad part is mentioned somewhere, but anyhow > a patch was put in to add a specific option to ipfw(8) to request > the quad notation If you get a new version of ipfw(8) it should > have the fix.. > Or pull the fix from the freebsd source cvs web page.. > pull and apply the diff for revision 1.114 from the following page > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sbin/ipfw/ipfw2.c > and apply it and then reinstall it. > that reminds me I need to merge this back to RELENG_7 Oh, and to RELENG_6 please, too. Then PR 120720 can be said to fully closed, yes. -- WBR, Vadim Goncharov. ICQ#166852181 mailto:vadim_nuclight@mail.ru [Moderator of RU.ANTI-ECOLOGY][FreeBSD][http://antigreen.org][LJ:/nuclight]