From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 6 17:12:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6102F16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 May 2004 17:12:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.dkm.cz (smtp.dkm.cz [62.24.64.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3E8BB43D41 for ; Thu, 6 May 2004 17:12:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from neuhauser@chello.cz) Received: (qmail 5524 invoked by uid 0); 7 May 2004 00:12:24 -0000 Received: from r3al16.mistral.cz (HELO isis.wad.cz) (213.220.229.16) by smtp.dkm.cz with SMTP; 7 May 2004 00:12:24 -0000 Received: by isis.wad.cz (Postfix, from userid 1001) id EB6292FDA01; Fri, 7 May 2004 02:12:23 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 02:12:23 +0200 From: Roman Neuhauser To: Kris Kennaway Message-ID: <20040507001223.GD75357@isis.wad.cz> Mail-Followup-To: Kris Kennaway , Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav , ports@freebsd.org References: <20040506210837.GB75357@isis.wad.cz> <20040506211732.GC75357@isis.wad.cz> <20040506212216.GB93216@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040506212216.GB93216@xor.obsecurity.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav Subject: Re: 'make clean' cosmetic bug X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 May 2004 00:12:26 -0000 # kris@obsecurity.org / 2004-05-06 14:22:16 -0700: > On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 11:17:32PM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > > > > ECHO_MSG=/usr/bin/printf in 8 Makefiles in the java category. > > > the ports have chatty IGNORE variables; I think this is usually > > > solved by catting a file, isn't it? I can generate a patch to > > > that effect if it's desired. > > > > actually, taking a glance at bsd.port.mk, this should be done > > using IGNORE_CMD, does this help? (it does here, I want to know > > it has no side effects) > > This patch looks good to me. These ports were also a problem case > when I tried to impose consistent quoting on IGNORE and BROKEN > strings, this should also address that particular hurdle. ok, filed as ports/66342 -- If you cc me or remove the list(s) completely I'll most likely ignore your message. see http://www.eyrie.org./~eagle/faqs/questions.html