From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 9 20:43:03 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1EA21065672; Tue, 9 Dec 2008 20:43:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sobomax@sippysoft.com) Received: from sippysoft.com (gk1.360sip.com [72.236.70.240]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B74268FC18; Tue, 9 Dec 2008 20:43:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sobomax@sippysoft.com) Received: from [192.168.1.38] (S0106001372fd1e07.vs.shawcable.net [70.71.171.106]) (authenticated bits=0) by sippysoft.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mB9KS5f4067465 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 9 Dec 2008 12:28:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sobomax@sippysoft.com) Message-ID: <493ED4B6.4010409@sippysoft.com> Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2008 12:27:34 -0800 From: Maxim Sobolev Organization: Sippy Software, Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Windows/20081105) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexey Dokuchaev References: <200812090602.mB962eiw090973@repoman.freebsd.org> <20081209191509.GA50518@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20081209191509.GA50518@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, ports-committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/asterisk Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2008 20:43:04 -0000 Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 06:02:40AM +0000, Maxim Sobolev wrote: >> sobomax 2008-12-09 06:02:40 UTC >> >> FreeBSD ports repository >> >> Modified files: >> net/asterisk Makefile >> Log: >> Convert all WITHOUT_XXX options into WITH_XXX form. OPTIONS system >> only really supports the latter. > > I've always been under impression that OPTIONS support both. Can you > please point to bpm/bom revisions where it was broken? Maybe I did not make myself clear, by "not supported" I have meant that in BATCH mode the mk is not automatically generating WITHOUT_XXX definitions for the items that are supposed to be off by default. You can get more details in the PR mentioned in the commit message. Regards, -- Maksym Sobolyev Sippy Software, Inc. Internet Telephony (VoIP) Experts T/F: +1-646-651-1110 Web: http://www.sippysoft.com MSN: sales@sippysoft.com Skype: SippySoft