From owner-freebsd-current Thu Oct 10 05:26:09 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id FAA16062 for current-outgoing; Thu, 10 Oct 1996 05:26:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail12.digital.com (mail12.digital.com [192.208.46.20]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id FAA16050 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 1996 05:26:06 -0700 (PDT) From: garyj@frt.dec.com Received: from cssmuc.frt.dec.com by mail12.digital.com (8.7.5/UNX 1.2/1.0/WV) id IAA30322; Thu, 10 Oct 1996 08:25:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost by cssmuc.frt.dec.com; (5.65v3.2/1.1.8.2/14Nov95-0232PM) id AA26207; Thu, 10 Oct 1996 14:25:40 +0200 Message-Id: <9610101225.AA26207@cssmuc.frt.dec.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.4 10/10/95 To: current@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Message from John Polstra of Wed, 09 Oct 96 18:34:06 PDT. Reply-To: gjennejohn@frt.dec.com Subject: Re: ldconfig problem Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 10 Oct 96 14:25:40 +0200 X-Mts: smtp Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk jdp@polstra.com writes: [snip] > > gdb internal error: Memory corruption > > Quit (core dumped) > > > > This error is not affected by ld.so.hints change. It happens > > regardless of whether kaffe runs or not. So, I guess now we have to > > do some investigation on gdb.... ;_) > > Gdb does that on my -current system too. I last updated the system a > few days ago, on October 5. > > I copied the -current libc.so.3.0 onto my -stable system, and then > executed the -current gdb from there. So that was using the dynamic > linker and ld.so.hints from -stable, and the gdb, crt0.o and libc from > -current. It still got the same error. > > I have a feeling that this particular problem is unrelated to the > dynamic linker. It's just a feeling, though. I'm not sure yet. > I'm running a -current kernel from Oct 8 and have been using gdb a lot lately (I'm making mods to it) and have not seen one problem with it. Well, no problem which isn't related to my changes, anyway :) The user-land stuff is older than my kernel, though. That may explain the difference. --- Gary Jennejohn (work) gjennejohn@frt.dec.com (home) Gary.Jennejohn@munich.netsurf.de (play) gj@freebsd.org