From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 8 23:13:40 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 036091065670 for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 23:13:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f170.google.com (mail-wi0-f170.google.com [209.85.212.170]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 835878FC1E for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 23:13:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhm4 with SMTP id hm4so1114169wib.1 for ; Tue, 08 May 2012 16:13:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=uVWpXNsj95Lf6Fgs/0WyJPRSiaJO9G2qb/6LMG5DZ/0=; b=WzQLDQpcV0k4oS8zBN0kL9fOWm64c0FC2Ob3ivzNYOWhxrowuv9ugT5RTOQ1CEZhKl nFDWg2J+0mWRNiTKMfjkzAUqD3ps6YjC1QLeH1Dr6TWuj7fhaRSkaHWu93hXhlf8pr0O +4MLGIrC95Jkq3d6F5+j8XkPf4Rr1RH5MRUXk= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=uVWpXNsj95Lf6Fgs/0WyJPRSiaJO9G2qb/6LMG5DZ/0=; b=Z8LngsslU2U/TWGhYG6y4ctGgjXE/4P306EFmsEcjmQBFqND/GhVXlLc37TOxWOUX2 e2n9MuEvdhjRQONhC+j7cpvr3MDlK3jGmy0fAJY8mlWcL8rfzN2zrk2pz7YlH+u9N5d0 /6wip/O5X7E/K3C2+UeqEyfeVyMpDJ6C0KgD4kwCLbumrTjhLa1Nzm7YgyFR8sBZTjBv GDnDrZBDtjRDTXONjCIFCRDMuzuMpaAPh/9nJE1SkmUHB3gF9DBhu1lsBfD7dEfGwEPs Rllau9JK/E8U+1OYEa+xwPOq6OYv41WRIdBIcHNg5bwADg5MbveyY0wOHwTvAqJ7NDRy n8tg== Received: by 10.180.76.232 with SMTP id n8mr1326504wiw.2.1336518813464; Tue, 08 May 2012 16:13:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.120.6 with HTTP; Tue, 8 May 2012 16:13:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120508085238.GA11712@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <20120508085238.GA11712@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> From: Eitan Adler Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 19:13:03 -0400 Message-ID: To: Anton Shterenlikht Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnkTxUkZRcObXRjyc685/vWkTEcujpc9Q4Bgmc9DliUciAkq8pznfF8evxUoOr2Q2qQwJ12 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is 9.9 patch still necessary X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 23:13:40 -0000 On 8 May 2012 04:52, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > I noticed that libtool-fixed is scheduled for > deletion because libtool now works fine with 10.x. > Does this mean that the 9.9 patch is no longer > needed? Or has I misunderstood something? It has not been needed for a long time now. Feel free to remove it from your local tree. -- Eitan Adler