From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed May 30 10:34:50 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ADA81065672;
	Wed, 30 May 2012 10:34:50 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from vmagerya@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-lb0-f182.google.com (mail-lb0-f182.google.com
	[209.85.217.182])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AD138FC0C;
	Wed, 30 May 2012 10:34:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by lbon10 with SMTP id n10so3864362lbo.13
	for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 30 May 2012 03:34:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=e1HfteMTv0cxBWBY0cIArklSi8PNAZYUlyc7GZm48ZA=;
	b=X7QG6dOw1gY9x8fj2Gs6liIO9K+9K6OJEfTd5WrOiNIeAaCM5Px0NKaERRWTGaPTsN
	kLEuOY1IxT9zLVxWKP3L3rutUBl+YAXawFupV3d+d4cB6lEATy4cQb0bYhqD6Je7TZny
	yFjXVf7pZ6mB6G5bvpe4LsSNAKXnmDgJypyYDkThHPd5VJQXSChdr9G1e0ouTetaCGkD
	Vsiy510qgOYd8PLf08vZyM6ybiaeLRwaM5O19ank48SDFRAQgkQTY8v44htrT9Iw2Jkb
	+vSsmD5SS+rATJ1eZ2pB+Ge0LeGyzRcgaP4DVshMymkKkbfiWJZDEnPp8QTZIQjFVHvM
	UqUw==
Received: by 10.152.144.234 with SMTP id sp10mr14815273lab.51.1338374088383;
	Wed, 30 May 2012 03:34:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.29.1.142] (altimet-gw.cs2.dp.wnet.ua. [217.20.178.249])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o5sm54503lbg.5.2012.05.30.03.34.46
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
	Wed, 30 May 2012 03:34:47 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4FC5F794.9050506@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 13:33:56 +0300
From: Vitaly Magerya <vmagerya@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Erwin Lansing <erwin@FreeBSD.org>
References: <4301C0E3-3C53-46E2-B5A5-7BD120CD775F@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <4301C0E3-3C53-46E2-B5A5-7BD120CD775F@FreeBSD.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] New framework options aka optionng
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 10:34:50 -0000

Folks, when moving forward with optionsng, do we want to convert
NOPORTDOCS and NOPORTEXAMPLES to options everywhere? I fear that if we
do, way too many ports which otherwise have no options will start asking
if I want the docs -- which I don't really care either way (unless that
brings in new dependencies).

Maybe it would be best if ports which otherwise don't have options, and
for which building docs don't require new dependencies would not put
DOCS and EXAMPLES into options? What do you think?