From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 3 8:46:22 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from wall.polstra.com (rtrwan160.accessone.com [206.213.115.74]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9776337B403 for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 08:46:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdp@wall.polstra.com) Received: from vashon.polstra.com (vashon.polstra.com [206.213.73.13]) by wall.polstra.com (8.11.3/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f63FkDD42417; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 08:46:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdp@wall.polstra.com) Received: (from jdp@localhost) by vashon.polstra.com (8.11.3/8.11.0) id f63FkCq09403; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 08:46:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdp) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 08:46:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200107031546.f63FkCq09403@vashon.polstra.com> To: stable@freebsd.org From: John Polstra Cc: rsowders@usgs.gov Subject: Re: Hard lockups since cvsup'ing Jul 1st. Help! In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Polstra & Co., Seattle, WA Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In article , Robert L Sowders wrote: > I took a look at the cvsweb and > noticed that mfs_vfsops.c was marked as removed at version 1.93 4 weeks > ago by phk, It was removed in -current, but not in -stable. A file in CVS can exist in some branches but not in others. > but two weeks ago version 181 was added and updated by 1.82 > but the dates are backwards on the versions. Screwy eh? That is not what I see when I look at cvsweb or use "cvs log". > There was a commit to the mfs_vfsops.c file done on Jun 17, that may have > been kinda screwy, or maybe it's just the cvs system. That commit was on the RELENG_4 branch (-stable), where the file is still alive. Nothing screwy there. > version 1.81 is marked as occuring on Jun 17, 2001 and version 1.82 > occurred at Apr 15 2000. I don't know where you saw that. CVSWeb shows a date of Dec 19, 1999 for revision 1.81 and Apr 15, 2000 for revision 1.82. That agrees with what is recorded in the actual RCS file. > I'm not sure if cvsup uses the date or the version when it's supping > files, If you are asking for the -stable branch with "tag=RELENG_4" then CVSup uses the version. > Checking my srcs locally it appears that indeed my cvsup pulled > version 1.81.2.1 dated 2001/06/17 which is wrong and does not have > the add in version 1.82. That is exactly what CVSup should have done. Revision 1.82 is not a part of -stable; it is in -current only. -stable was branched at revision 1.81, before revision 1.82 was created. For -stable, the revision after 1.81 is 1.81.2.1. Next will come 1.81.2.2, etc. > I wonder how many other things are screwy in the cvs repository? I don't see anything screwy there. :-) John -- John Polstra jdp@polstra.com John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA "Disappointment is a good sign of basic intelligence." -- Chögyam Trungpa To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message