From owner-freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 30 00:12:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: small@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1CAA16A870 for ; Tue, 30 May 2006 00:12:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jim@netgate.com) Received: from netgate.com (mail.netgate.com [64.62.194.115]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9301B43D4C for ; Tue, 30 May 2006 00:12:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jim@netgate.com) Received: from [192.168.2.184] (rrcs-67-52-77-54.west.biz.rr.com [67.52.77.54]) by netgate.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 637CC28000B; Mon, 29 May 2006 17:11:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <9f7850090605291049j2d6c6e41wff1330e114fa91a7@mail.gmail.com> References: <9f7850090605271000j524d6a35gfa3f6df1f0ed59f5@mail.gmail.com> <9f7850090605291049j2d6c6e41wff1330e114fa91a7@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v750) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jim Thompson Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 14:11:46 -1000 To: "marty fouts" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.750) Cc: Alexander Leidinger , Poul-Henning Kamp , small@freebsd.org, Andrew Atrens Subject: Re: FreeBSD's embedded agenda X-BeenThere: freebsd-small@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Dedicated and Embedded Systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 00:12:04 -0000 On May 29, 2006, at 7:49 AM, marty fouts wrote: > On 5/28/06, James Mansion wrote: >> >Experience suggests that wear leveling does matter in this >> market, but >> >that fairly simple wear leveling can be very effective. >> >> Can I ask why? I mmay be a very bed person to talk about phones, >> because I have a 6-year-old Seimens I chose for battery life and >> the first thing I did was disable IrDa and WAP. It doesn't have >> a camera. ;-) And I've never sent a text. >> > > Two reasons: First, NAND devices have a complicated wear behavior. The > more frequently you hit the same block, the lower the life expectancy > of the block. Uh... 'hit' is 'write', correct? and I don't think its got anything to do with frequency, but hey, I've been wrong before, feel free to correct me.