From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 14 12:38:10 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B74D16A402 for ; Mon, 14 May 2007 12:38:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivoras@fer.hr) Received: from pinus.cc.fer.hr (pinus.cc.fer.hr [161.53.73.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF6CD13C44B for ; Mon, 14 May 2007 12:38:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivoras@fer.hr) Received: from [161.53.72.113] (lara.cc.fer.hr [161.53.72.113]) by pinus.cc.fer.hr (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id l4ECls3f000585; Mon, 14 May 2007 14:47:54 +0200 (MEST) Message-ID: <46485822.7080000@fer.hr> Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 14:37:54 +0200 From: Ivan Voras User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20060911) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Watson References: <20070512153532.GQ21795@elvis.mu.org> <63984.1178992555@critter.freebsd.dk> <20070513215442.GZ21795@elvis.mu.org> <46478C9A.9050807@fer.hr> <20070514132901.X24765@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <20070514132901.X24765@fledge.watson.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.2.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigAA40514D9AE0E1F1B5200EA2" Cc: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: HEADS DOWN X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 12:38:10 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigAA40514D9AE0E1F1B5200EA2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Robert Watson wrote: > Actually, competitive MySQL benchmarking against Linux seems to=20 > illustrate that jemalloc is dramatically more scalable than the native = > glibc malloc, and comparable with the google malloc. =20 Did NetCraft confirm it? :) (i.e. it's still a long time until someone from "the other camp" can=20 install a shiny new 7.0-RELEASE and test it :) ) --------------enigAA40514D9AE0E1F1B5200EA2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGSFgvldnAQVacBcgRAl7yAKDm5xpoayv2DwDMecaZiLhN5CI1cACgolNz KT7BwaG/a9Xovw1RDscbo+k= =Nv4k -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigAA40514D9AE0E1F1B5200EA2--