From owner-freebsd-bugs Sat Nov 27 23: 0: 5 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BBAE14C83 for ; Sat, 27 Nov 1999 23:00:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id XAA47592; Sat, 27 Nov 1999 23:00:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sat, 27 Nov 1999 23:00:02 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199911280700.XAA47592@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Tomoaki NISHIYAMA Subject: Re: misc/15127 Reply-To: Tomoaki NISHIYAMA Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR misc/15127; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Tomoaki NISHIYAMA To: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Cc: tomoaki@biol.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Subject: Re: misc/15127 Date: Sun, 28 Nov 1999 15:57:14 +0900 Sorry, the fix I proposed in the pr misc/15127 will break up the is* macros. I would alternatively propose to substitute _? to _CTYPE_?. for example substitute _T with _CTYPE_T -- Tomoaki Nishiyama e-mail:tomoaki@biol.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Department of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message