From owner-freebsd-ports  Tue Aug 20 04:13:32 1996
Return-Path: owner-ports
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id EAA19734
          for ports-outgoing; Tue, 20 Aug 1996 04:13:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id EAA19720
          for <ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 20 Aug 1996 04:13:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.7.5/8.6.9) id EAA01951; Tue, 20 Aug 1996 04:13:20 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 1996 04:13:20 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199608201113.EAA01951@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: chuckr@glue.umd.edu
CC: sysseh@devetir.qld.gov.au, ports@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <Pine.OSF.3.95.960819204306.7962C-100000@skipper.eng.umd.edu> (message from Chuck Robey on Mon, 19 Aug 1996 20:54:08 -0400 (EDT))
Subject: Re: PREFIX with X11 ports
From: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * There is one variable I've found, XUSERFILESEARCHPATH, that seems ideally
 * useable as a method of moving the defaults stuff where we want it.

But that is what the X window system leaves to the user for additional 
configuration.  I'm a little weary about us taking it away, as it
doesn't belong to the system, and the ports tree is more on the system 
side than the user side.

What do you think?

Satoshi