From owner-freebsd-current Sun Mar 31 0: 5:51 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from gull.prod.itd.earthlink.net (gull.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.84]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC99037B41A; Sun, 31 Mar 2002 00:05:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from pool0142.cvx22-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([209.179.198.142] helo=mindspring.com) by gull.prod.itd.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 16raLT-00000z-00; Sun, 31 Mar 2002 00:05:47 -0800 Message-ID: <3CA6C341.AF6D3FDD@mindspring.com> Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2002 00:05:21 -0800 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en]C-CCK-MCD {Sony} (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Smith Cc: Alfred Perlstein , scott_long@btc.adaptec.com, mark_salyzyn@adaptec.com, obrien@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: asr can not map memory? References: <200203310801.g2V81Dc03587@mass.dis.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Michael Smith wrote: > > What's the basis of the assumption that the I/O range is > > unsupported in the first place, and why isn't it true for this > > bridge chip, if it's a valid assumption for others? > > The information was provided in the debugging output and code that Alfred > supplied in earlier messages. The short answer is "programmer error". > > You're walking into another conversation with insufficient context. 8) Hey, I'll always sit still for someone willing to give me context... 8-). I was thinking it would be easier to get enough info to Alfred, and let the patch pop out there. 8-) 8-). -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message