From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 24 07:00:57 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAC17907 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 07:00:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trashcan@odo.in-berlin.de) Received: from mx1.enfer-du-nord.net (mx1.enfer-du-nord.net [91.121.60.26]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 830202F36 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 07:00:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sulu.fritz.box (p3EE2F2F2.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [62.226.242.242]) by mx1.enfer-du-nord.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3cMVkH4QGPz7KZ for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 09:00:55 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\)) Subject: Re: [poudriere] creation/update of jails failing From: Michael Grimm In-Reply-To: <5217D8EA.4000100@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 09:00:54 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <14794C91-2293-4D23-B42F-CBCF883D1296@odo.in-berlin.de> References: <3E418671-076C-4C2B-98E6-E85D6E0E6A66@odo.in-berlin.de> <5217D8EA.4000100@gmail.com> To: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 07:00:57 -0000 Hi - On 23.08.2013, at 23:49, Andrei Brezan wrote: > On 08/23/13 22:28, Michael Grimm wrote: >> I do have two jails compiling packages for release and stable created = some time ago by: >>=20 >> | poudriere jail -c stable -c -v stable/9 -m svn -J 6 >> | poudriere jail -c release -c -v releng/9.2 -m svn -J 6 > What does the second -c stand for? I presume it's a typo. Yes, that is a typo and should have been "-j stable" and "-j release" = respectively. > releng/9.2 can be fetched with -m ftp (which is default) instead of = building it with buildworld unless you need the custom build which might = be the cause of the update failing then. >=20 > poudriere jail -c -j release -v 9.2-RC2 As mentioned before: I am a newbie regarding poudriere. I must have = failed to understand the jail concept from the beginning. I always = believed that the method to chose for creation and updating my poudriere = jails should be the same I use following FBSD at my target machines (svn = and compiling from source). Now, the creation of both 9.2-PRERELEASE and 9.2-RC2 jails by "-m ftp" = has been successful and BTW very much faster as well ;-). Thanks for = pointing me into that direction. >> Starting yesterday I have to deal with failing updates: >>=20 >> | poudriere jail -c stable -u -J 6 >> | poudriere jail -c release -u -J 6 > Can you try without -J 6? Just a shot in the dark. JFTR: No, that didn't help. I did run into the same error. Anyway, I will stick to the default method from now on. Thanks, Michael=