From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Dec 10 04:58:21 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id EAA11016 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 10 Dec 1997 04:58:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers) Received: from cheops.anu.edu.au (avalon@cheops.anu.edu.au [150.203.76.24]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id EAA10998 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 1997 04:58:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au) Message-Id: <199712101258.EAA10998@hub.freebsd.org> Received: by cheops.anu.edu.au (1.37.109.16/16.2) id AA118098245; Wed, 10 Dec 1997 23:50:45 +1100 From: Darren Reed Subject: Re: Why so many steps to build new kernel? To: helbig@Informatik.BA-Stuttgart.DE (Wolfgang Helbig) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 1997 23:50:45 +1100 (EDT) Cc: dkelly@hiwaay.net, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <199712101014.LAA14585@rvc1.informatik.ba-stuttgart.de> from "Wolfgang Helbig" at Dec 10, 97 11:14:24 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In some mail from Wolfgang Helbig, sie said: > > > Whats wrong with "make depend kernel install"? That's what I've been > > The "depend" target produces the file .depend, which will be read > by make(1) on the *next* run. It doesn't use the carefully built > dependency rules for the "kernel" and "install" targets in this run. > > So, if you build the kernel each time from a clean build directory, > the "depend" target is superfluous. How about this: make depend && make kernel && make install Darren