Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2016 13:15:41 +0100 From: Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> To: kpneal@pobox.com Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Newer clang than comes with install? Message-ID: <E357A283-A6A1-4213-83FF-691DC9F2029E@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20160303134505.GB26990@neutralgood.org> References: <20160303134505.GB26990@neutralgood.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Apple-Mail=_73B9AF76-1365-49E1-9338-126082E65F5A Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On 03 Mar 2016, at 14:45, kpneal@pobox.com wrote: > > I notice on 10.2 we're using "FreeBSD clang version 3.4.1". But there are > bugs in this version of clang that I'm having trouble with. Which specific bugs are those? > Is compiling a newer (say, 3.7.1) version of clang to target FreeBSD > supported? I have no desire to replace any of the libraries, just the > compiler itself. Is that supposed to work _without_ going through the > ports/pkgs system? > > IOW, can I just download from llvm.org the clang+llvm source, compile > it on FreeBSD, and then use it safely? Sure. You can also download pre-compiled versions from llvm.org, if you want. Though if you can settle for a pre-compiled version, installing it through pkg(1) is probably much easier. -Dimitry --Apple-Mail=_73B9AF76-1365-49E1-9338-126082E65F5A Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.29 iEYEARECAAYFAlbazfUACgkQsF6jCi4glqM5hwCfXyzBcOqQRYKagVIWzcRMGr0M SPkAn2nhCyJM8G2KUPFDlmbaMOhfHgMP =f1/A -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_73B9AF76-1365-49E1-9338-126082E65F5A--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E357A283-A6A1-4213-83FF-691DC9F2029E>