From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 14:41:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2105416A420 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 14:41:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D536B43D46 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 14:41:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC2D21A4E64; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 06:41:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6BFAE517BC; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 09:41:10 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 09:41:09 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: "Patrick M. Hausen" Message-ID: <20060228144109.GA72408@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20060228101453.GB47953@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> <20060228102150.GA56625@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060228110251.GD47953@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060228110251.GD47953@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: stable@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: NFS locking question X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 14:41:12 -0000 --fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 12:02:51PM +0100, Patrick M. Hausen wrote: > Hi, Kris! >=20 > On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 05:21:50AM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote: >=20 > > Try the attached patch on the 6.0 machines: >=20 > Thanks. Will do. >=20 > But: >=20 > > Index: usr.sbin/rpc.lockd/lock_proc.c > > ... >=20 > So, rpc.lockd _is_ needed on the client? Yes. If you weren't doing that, do that instead. > What about the statement in rc.conf(5) then, claiming it was > only started on servers? I only see this (correct) statement in that manpage: rpc_lockd_enable (bool) If set to ``YES'' and also an NFS server or client, run rpc.lockd(8) at boot time. Kris --fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEBGEEWry0BWjoQKURAjGoAJ9rE3yWqsNwDB2oAraV1/+GXdxFZgCeJC8F YdGPmzWIHh/Qt3xyxUXD3ec= =A72+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7--