From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 21 21:22:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9323916A403 for ; Thu, 21 Dec 2006 21:22:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mjacob@FreeBSD.org) Received: from ns1.feral.com (ns1.feral.com [192.67.166.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89E0613C43E for ; Thu, 21 Dec 2006 21:22:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mjacob@FreeBSD.org) Received: from ns1.feral.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns1.feral.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kBLJnE24069357; Thu, 21 Dec 2006 11:49:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mjacob@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost (mjacob@localhost) by ns1.feral.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id kBLJnDZc069354; Thu, 21 Dec 2006 11:49:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mjacob@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: ns1.feral.com: mjacob owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 11:49:13 -0800 (PST) From: mjacob@FreeBSD.org X-X-Sender: mjacob@ns1.feral.com To: Rong-en Fan In-Reply-To: <6eb82e0612200901i7a95ad49sd5b0ea66db72939b@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20061221114852.P69280@ns1.feral.com> References: <6eb82e0612181734n92e4a95l9d54aeb1edae87d1@mail.gmail.com> <4589518C.3070507@samsco.org> <6eb82e0612200716x4fcf6960t3c5fe5cab5fd0bcf@mail.gmail.com> <458955F0.4020102@samsco.org> <6eb82e0612200901i7a95ad49sd5b0ea66db72939b@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: FreeBSD Current Subject: Re: bigdisk and scsi_da X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: mjacob@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 21:22:04 -0000 >> Ok, it makes a whole lot more sense now. 7-CURRENT has checks to >> prevent the divide-by-zero. I'm still looking into the actual >> bug, though. > > OK. Manually backports rev 1.10 of sys/dev/cam/cam.c solved this > divided by zero problem. Could you or mjacob MFC this to RELENG_6 > and/or RELENG_6_2? > I'll take care of at least part of this.