From owner-freebsd-current Thu Jul 24 11:52:42 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA17732 for current-outgoing; Thu, 24 Jul 1997 11:52:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hwcn.org (main.hwcn.org [199.212.94.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA17726 for ; Thu, 24 Jul 1997 11:52:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca (ac199@james.hwcn.org [199.212.94.66]) by hwcn.org (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id OAA28928; Thu, 24 Jul 1997 14:46:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (ac199@localhost) by james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca (8.8.6/8.8.6) with SMTP id OAA29061; Thu, 24 Jul 1997 14:46:32 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca: ac199 owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 24 Jul 1997 14:46:31 -0400 (EDT) From: Tim Vanderhoek X-Sender: ac199@james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca Reply-To: hoek@hwcn.org To: Tom cc: Warner Losh , current@FreeBSD.ORG, andreas@klemm.gtn.com Subject: Re: lpr/lpd changes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Wed, 23 Jul 1997, Tom wrote: > On Wed, 23 Jul 1997, Tim Vanderhoek wrote: > > > suggestion that apsfilter be feeped a little bit more to ask "lpd is > > currently disabled in /etc/rc.conf. Do you want to enable it? [Y/N]" > > But can't the user do that manually? Well, it could simply print up a warning "lpd is disabled in /etc/rc.conf -- you must turn it on before this package is of any use to you", but if it's going to do that it might as well go the rest of the way and offer to turn it on for the user. -- Outnumbered? Maybe. Outspoken? Never! tIM...HOEk