Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 17:55:11 +0200 From: Juan =?iso-8859-1?b?UmFt824=?= Molina Menor <listjm@club.fr> To: "<freebsd-x11@freebsd.org>" <freebsd-x11@freebsd.org>, Matthew Macy <mmacy@nextbsd.org> Subject: Update 2 the state of drm-next-4.6 and next steps Message-ID: <57486DDF.2050504@club.fr>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> ---- On Tue, 24 May 2016 01:41:26 -0700 Alexander Mishurov <alexander.m.mishurov at gmail.com > <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11>>; wrote ---- > > It's a SoC, actually. It doesn't even use a dedicated PCI address for > > "dev_priv->bridge_dev", I set the same address for bridge_dev as for > > video device itself in order to get some data from regs when I tried to > > rev my video. > > > > Also, I included device id, 0x0f31, to agp_i810.c which had a valleyvew > > driver in 3.8 update in order to load agp driver first. I don't know > > whether it is necessary in the newest versions, just in case. > > If it needs agp, that would explain it. I haven't reved agp support with > the new drm. That's also why I don't support Arrandale yet. I thought agp > was dead. But maybe not for SoCs. Thanks. > > -M Hi! With a fresh DRM 4.6 kernel built this morning I can confirm the regression in AGP with a G41 Express chip which works very well with the 3.9 version of DRM. I don’t know if a proper PR is necessary. Best regards, Juan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?57486DDF.2050504>