From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu May 16 21:23:18 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id VAA09261 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 16 May 1996 21:23:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rocky.sri.MT.net (rocky.sri.MT.net [204.182.243.10]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id VAA09253 for ; Thu, 16 May 1996 21:23:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.sri.MT.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) id WAA25749; Thu, 16 May 1996 22:20:58 -0600 Date: Thu, 16 May 1996 22:20:58 -0600 From: Nate Williams Message-Id: <199605170420.WAA25749@rocky.sri.MT.net> To: "Serge A. Babkin" Cc: nate@sri.MT.net (Nate Williams), kevin@NDA.COM, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xircom hardware specs In-Reply-To: <199605170310.JAA05519@hq.icb.chel.su> References: <199605170031.SAA25091@rocky.sri.MT.net> <199605170310.JAA05519@hq.icb.chel.su> Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Serge A. Babkin writes: > > > i sent email to xircom customer support and was informed that they > > > would release the specs to interested developers. is anyone pursuing > > > this? > > > > Nope, because signing an NDA means the source can't be distributed if a > > driver is written. > > > > > ps next and solaris x86 provide xircom drivers, not sure if freebsd > > > is kernel compat with them (probably not...) > > > > Nope, and NeXTStep and Solaris don't provide OS source, so signing an > > NDA is not a problem. > > But it's possible to take say BSDI driver, disassemble it and make the specs > publically available. If you think writing a driver is worth taking the time to disassemble it, more power to you. There are *plenty* of other boards that provide almost the exact same functionality that are made by manufacturers that will provide programming specifications. Nate