From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 17:34:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D74DA106564A for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:34:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from smtp.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 972AD8FC1C for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:34:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [84.49.246.2]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D3661FFC34; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:34:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 4188D845D6; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 19:31:53 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: "M. Warner Losh" References: <20100628.112008.459136215980124736.imp@bsdimp.com> <86r5jqdz9w.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20100629.111548.441937720337056244.imp@bsdimp.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 19:31:52 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20100629.111548.441937720337056244.imp@bsdimp.com> (M. Warner Losh's message of "Tue, 29 Jun 2010 11:15:48 -0600 (MDT)") Message-ID: <86ocet219z.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: yanefbsd@gmail.com, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, hselasky@c2i.net Subject: Re: Patch for rc.d/devd on FreeBSD 9-current X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:34:05 -0000 "M. Warner Losh" writes: > I went ahead and used pidfile_close in this context because that's > what's recommended in the man page. I know it is likely redundant, > but I thought better safe than sorry... agreed... DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no