Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2023 00:08:42 -0700 From: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> To: George Mitchell <george+freebsd@m5p.com>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Periodic rant about SCHED_ULE Message-ID: <4b92fb09-7083-f3c4-d503-f34d57d0a6d4@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <efbce2d1-dfc1-f6e2-6a32-c9fb411e4daf@m5p.com> References: <ZB%2B/CjZOv0C0pzOX@disp.intra.daemon.contact> <efbce2d1-dfc1-f6e2-6a32-c9fb411e4daf@m5p.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 3/26/23 11:24 AM, George Mitchell wrote: > On 3/25/23 23:42, Peter wrote: >> > > To oversimplify the discussion I've seen so far on this thread: > > It would be really nice if the schedulers were kernel loadable modules. > GSoC project? > > Whether SCHED_ULE or SCHED_4BSD should be the default scheduler in the > GENERIC kernel is a contentious discussion, but perhaps we need to have > that discussion. -- George > When I abstracted out teh kernel scheduler ABI/API some time ago (25 years maybe?) I thought about making a loadable module but there were a lot of gotchas that stopped me. I can't even remember what they all were. Maybe it might be more doable now.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4b92fb09-7083-f3c4-d503-f34d57d0a6d4>