From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 3 09:02:24 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F250A16A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 09:02:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from limicola.its.uu.se (limicola.its.UU.SE [130.238.7.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6040943D3F for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 09:02:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ante@Update.UU.SE) Received: by limicola.its.uu.se (Postfix, from userid 205) id 259714910; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 10:02:22 +0100 (MEZ) Received: from limicola.its.uu.se(127.0.0.1) by limicola.its.uu.se via virus-scan id s3923; Mon, 3 Jan 05 10:02:17 +0100 Received: from Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE [130.238.19.25]) by limicola.its.uu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FB4348FF for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 10:02:17 +0100 (MEZ) Received: by Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Postfix, from userid 30086) id 5D65338013; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 10:02:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54E565C002 for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 10:02:17 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 10:02:17 +0100 (CET) From: Andreas Davour To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Problem compiling gcc3.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 09:02:25 -0000 Hi! On my FreeBSD 5.2-RELEASE GENERIC (yeah, I will upgrade soon) I can't get the gcc3.4 port to compile. Unless I'm mistaken, gcc3.4 is used for 5.3 nowdays. Do I dare to upgrade to 5.3 or do I have the chance of ending up with a broken compiler? Or, is it just that the port is broken for 5.2? I haven't found any hints in UPDATING. /Andreas -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?