From owner-freebsd-current Sun May 19 03:58:12 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id DAA16121 for current-outgoing; Sun, 19 May 1996 03:58:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from news1.gtn.com (news1.gtn.com [192.109.159.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id DAA16094 for ; Sun, 19 May 1996 03:58:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by news1.gtn.com (8.7.2/8.7.2) id MAA05329; Sun, 19 May 1996 12:45:27 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by knobel.gun.de (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id MAA01719; Sun, 19 May 1996 12:43:47 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Sun, 19 May 1996 12:43:46 +0200 (MET DST) From: Andreas Klemm To: Michael Smith cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Standard Shipping Containers - A Proposal for Distributing FreeBSD In-Reply-To: <199605170626.PAA10859@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- On Fri, 17 May 1996, Michael Smith wrote: > All this discussion is telling us is that there are several different ways > by which FreeBSD source code is distributed, and each of these > different ways works well for different people. > > What's wrong with things as they are? Why should anyone feel compelled to > change things if they're not broken? True ! - -- andreas@knobel.gun.de /\/\___ Wiechers & Partner Datentechnik GmbH Andreas Klemm ___/\/\/ $$ Support Unix - aklemm@wup.de $$ pgp p-key http://www-swiss.ai.mit.edu/~bal/pks-toplev.html >>> powered by <<< ftp://sunsite.unc.edu/pub/Linux/system/Printing/aps-491.tgz >>> FreeBSD <<< -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBMZ77YvMLpmkD/U+FAQHkugP+OdMQKii8RiRxBiwcuAPNgHbb7s5WqCXB DR83Pugg8HTU/C2QAlVH7/xeZz7Bnm7a3VMmFdGmhjqaSominxPjT4GYbyMTuKLw bZZqCaP9ynTc5GaMRDIqWePYkiSBbBw4rF5uO2F7tKiOrrzGj4LVYovnxvuENl41 3E+hknlSHMI= =pYFY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----