From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 24 13:38:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8075916A4CE; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 13:38:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from srv1.cosmo-project.de (srv1.cosmo-project.de [213.83.6.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEC0043D1F; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 13:38:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely5.cicely.de (cicely5.cicely.de [IPv6:3ffe:400:8d0:301:200:92ff:fe9b:20e7]) (authenticated bits=0) i1OLcQrQ083238 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=OK); Tue, 24 Feb 2004 22:38:29 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely12.cicely.de (cicely12.cicely.de [IPv6:3ffe:400:8d0:301::12]) by cicely5.cicely.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i1OLcHuL038918 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 24 Feb 2004 22:38:18 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely12.cicely.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cicely12.cicely.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i1OLcHc5093543; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 22:38:17 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: (from ticso@localhost) by cicely12.cicely.de (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i1OLcG5u093542; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 22:38:16 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 22:38:16 +0100 From: Bernd Walter To: Oliver Lehmann Message-ID: <20040224213815.GB44313@cicely12.cicely.de> References: <20040223192103.59ad7b69.lehmann@ans-netz.de> <20040223191652.GB5837@freebie.xs4all.nl> <20040223205152.GC44313@cicely12.cicely.de> <20040224215457.34d3decd.lehmann@ans-netz.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040224215457.34d3decd.lehmann@ans-netz.de> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD cicely12.cicely.de 5.2-CURRENT alpha User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.61 X-Spam-Report: * -4.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on cicely5.cicely.de X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 00:34:29 -0800 cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org cc: ticso@cicely.de cc: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org cc: wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl Subject: Re: Bad performance on alpha? (make buildworld) X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: ticso@cicely.de List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 21:38:34 -0000 On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 09:54:57PM +0100, Oliver Lehmann wrote: > Bernd Walter wrote: > > > I think thats around factor 2-4 slower. > > Especially without having CPUTYPE >=ev56 set. > > Ok, I have CPUTYPE=ev56 now set in make.conf and I got slightly better > results: > > make buildworld 19144.53 real 16475.63 user 1964.88 sys > make -j2 buildworld 19530.91 real 16784.12 user 2143.32 sys > make -j3 buildworld 19639.32 real 16948.23 user 2173.32 sys > make -j4 buildworld 19892.68 real 17177.20 user 2202.12 sys > > I installed the last buildworld and built a new kernel... let's see how > those new (with CPUTYPE=56 compiled) binaries are performing... > *reruning-tests* The binaries are only used to build the toolchain. The remaining part of the buildworld aren't using the system binaries. -- B.Walter BWCT http://www.bwct.de ticso@bwct.de info@bwct.de