From owner-freebsd-alpha Tue Jan 23 13:38:47 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from duke.cs.duke.edu (duke.cs.duke.edu [152.3.140.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C203937B69F for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 13:38:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (grasshopper.cs.duke.edu [152.3.145.30]) by duke.cs.duke.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA02883; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 16:38:24 -0500 (EST) Received: (from gallatin@localhost) by grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (8.11.1/8.9.1) id f0NLcOe15726; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 16:38:24 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu) From: Andrew Gallatin MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 16:38:24 -0500 (EST) To: "Craig Burgess" Cc: Subject: RE: msg: '/kernel: file: table is full' In-Reply-To: References: <14957.59217.474070.92428@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> X-Mailer: VM 6.43 under 20.4 "Emerald" XEmacs Lucid Message-ID: <14957.63811.45813.958530@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Craig Burgess writes: > > Obviously something is not right. I send this in case it means anything to > anyone and will rebuild the kernel with maxusers at 64 (up from 32) - though Your messagebuffer problem looks like some sort of memory corruption, to be honest. > it would seem that '32 users' should be sufficient for a machine which has > virtually no users other than the processes which are running. > A lot of resources are sized by the number of "users" 32 is not anywhere near anough for a heavily loaded server, as yours appears to be. If you're doing something that's going to run you out of open files, try 256 or 512. Drew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message