Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2013 15:11:55 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Mehmet Erol Sanliturk <m.e.sanliturk@gmail.com> Cc: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: considering i386 as a tier 1 architecture Message-ID: <86li92pf8k.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <CAOgwaMtDLXydSiMUukqUV3TxXnxHURVsJu%2Bfxy94yaXwddaeMQ@mail.gmail.com> (Mehmet Erol Sanliturk's message of "Mon, 1 Apr 2013 04:08:35 -0700") References: <CAF6rxgnYOwAPnpykTAN-Eu=oeee_uBMt1ud8U4RpyKLO5S257Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAOgwaMt2Qvt8c4YvRLJ23sqpODvb00XgwY7Czr%2BJVALXmK1wLA@mail.gmail.com> <86wqsmpmb0.fsf@ds4.des.no> <CAOgwaMtDLXydSiMUukqUV3TxXnxHURVsJu%2Bfxy94yaXwddaeMQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mehmet Erol Sanliturk <m.e.sanliturk@gmail.com> writes: > Since I am not a developer or user of such a system , I can not say > whether 25000 packages are necessary for them or not. Reducing any > amount of work load which its outcome is not directly used is a > contribution to the FreeBSD project by diverting such efforts to other > man power or resources required areas. You're assuming that maintaining i386 as a tier 1 platform really *does* add significantly to our workload. You should also check your calendar :) DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86li92pf8k.fsf>