From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 27 11:33:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDB62106566B for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:33:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pluknet@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (mail-qy0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 753CD8FC17 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:33:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk33 with SMTP id 33so599545qyk.13 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 04:33:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=H9BarpYbEommN7/37tgyzYxP5bfNn0zNblxX33V9ciQ=; b=O0phsBzffUxW0vglYtNBgIhSZKvtduCCbzBykIag4+O39coHg5QISMw1yJCySyko4I MLt+IjFDVY9QMJpUOOfR0hnNdDNROwUHsuMq9EHxQLeMNvI52Nfb6+XpjJ4kq0lR7B2N 4SHUJogz10shdF7vpDOFzNaLJDuNl0zdkRBJU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=wIhhHhykK9TRrMWzUghXbN2Z3e+S8fpd9imqpfoNJRVcKZmy7VofMROFgFpekP9ht0 fI64DjVidBgeNUIKvz2OU/CERab1ZwmHq6c6IvqE55Bdw617GNwtclgowoowIi3AYbVX 3CuDbfUBHxEP+GIYSEMt0CDk62IfAt9xMFI6o= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.35.16 with SMTP id n16mr8575133qcd.172.1288179193764; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 04:33:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.69.135 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 04:33:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1288160610.4280.18.camel@apollon> References: <1288160610.4280.18.camel@apollon> Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:33:13 +0400 Message-ID: From: Sergey Kandaurov To: Lars Hartmann Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix 'implicit declaration' warning and update vgone(9) X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:33:14 -0000 On 27 October 2010 10:23, Lars Hartmann wrote: > The vgonel function isnt declarated in any header, the vgonel prototype > in vgone(9) isnt correct - found by Ben Kaduk Hi. I'm afraid it's just an overlooked man page after many VFS changes in 5.x. As vgonel() is a static (i.e. private and not visible from outside) function IMO it should be removed from vgone(9) man page. -- wbr, pluknet